Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away
We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

HUM101 Module 8: Portfolio Project (Final)

HUM101 Module 8: Portfolio Project (Final)

HUM101 Module 8: Portfolio Project (Final)

Question Description

The following question is worth 300 points, or the majority of my final grade. Again this professor has been very difficult to work with and grades strictly off of the rubric. (100 level class with 500 level expectations) It is due no later than the 4th of Aug. at 12am. But would like to review it on the 2nd of Aug., giving time for any revisions.

Please let me know if you need any additional information to get started on it.

Thanks again!

Option #1: Critical Thinking Paper on Issue or Problem

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, write a paper that addresses the problem or issue via scholarly sources.
Your paper should include the following:

  1. Title page: include your name, date, title of essay, and class
  2. Introduction: provide a two-paragraph introduction (Links to an external site.) that frames the issue or problem carefully
  3. Engagement with issue or problem using scholarly sources and the intellectual standards proposed by Paul and Elder (2012): What
    is the issue? Why is it significant? Why is this issue relevant to you
    (and/or your community)? What have you learned about the depth and
    breadth of the issue or problem from scholarly sources? How do the
    scholarly sources aid you in fair-mindedness and logic?
  4. Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect
    on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking.
    What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and
    elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative
    solutions? What critical questions remain?
  5. References
  6. Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a
    section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of
    the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for
    each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final
    Portfolio.

Details

  • Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is
    acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to
    support your inferences.
  • Your paper should engage a minimum of six scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
  • Your paper should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

  • Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
  • Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Option #2: Annotated Bibliography

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, construct an annotated bibliography (Links to an external site.) that addresses the problem or issue through scholarly sources. See this example (Links to an external site.) for a good overview of how an annotated bibliography should be
constructed.
Your annotated bibliography should include the following:

  1. Title page: include your name, date, title of annotated bibliography, and class
  2. Introduction (Links to an external site.): provide a two-paragraph introduction that frames the issue or problem carefully
  3. Annotations (Links to an external site.):
    Summarize the main point or arguments of each scholarly source. What
    are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What
    topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about,
    what would you say? After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to
    evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other
    sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this
    source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Each
    annotation should be roughly one or two paragraphs in length.
  4. Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect
    on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking.
    What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and
    elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative
    solutions?
  5. References
  6. Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a
    section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of
    the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for
    each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final
    Portfolio.

Details

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

  • Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
  • Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

40.0
to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of critical thinking; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0
to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0
to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

16.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Requirements

30.0
to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0
to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0
to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critical Analysis

45.0
to >36.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

36.0
to >27.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

27.0
to >18.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

18.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Synthesis and Evaluation

30.0
to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Information
is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation is
rigorous, affording a comprehensive and coherent analysis or synthesis.

24.0
to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Information
is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation approaches
course expectations in developing a coherent analysis or synthesis.

18.0
to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation

Reliability
or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Some
interpretation and/or evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent
analysis or synthesis.

12.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Little to no interpretation and/or evaluation.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis

35.0
to >28.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Provides
strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and
applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

28.0
to >21.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some
significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking
and reasoning.

21.0
to >14.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major
errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and
applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

14.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Journal Submissions

30.0
to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation

All
journal entries are completed. Each journal submission engages with
assigned material. Each submission uses tools of the module to address
issues of critical reasoning.

24.0
to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

At
least six journal entries are completed. At least six journal
submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the module
to address issues of critical reasoning.

18.0
to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation

18
to 13 Points: At least four journal entries are completed. At least
four journal submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of
the module to address issues of critical reasoning.

12.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

At
least two journal entries are completed. At least two journal
submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the module
to address issues of critical reasoning.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Sources

15.0
to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least six to five credible sources.

12.0
to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates four to three credible sources.

9.0
to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation

9 to 7 Points: Cites and integrates two to one credible sources.

6.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Application of Source Material

15.0
to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Sources
well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the
issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

12.0
to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

9.0
to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization

20.0
to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format
including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project
requirements.

16.0
to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small
number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing;
is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project
requirements.

12.0
to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major
problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper
essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project
requirements.

8.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar and Style

20.0
to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Strong
sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and
spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no
unsupported comments.

16.0
to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0
to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Inconsistent
to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on
grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Demonstrates proper use of APA style

20.0
to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

16.0
to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Few
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0
to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Significant
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

8.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Numerous
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts

Total Points:
300.0

We offer the best custom essay writing services at an affordable rate. We have done this assignment before, we can also do it for you.

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Essay Pillars only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Essay Pillars are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Essay Pillars is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Essay Pillars, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.